Attitudes of young consumers toward farm animal welfare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63356/agrores.2025.012Keywords:
animal welfare, consumers’ attitude, willingness to payAbstract
This study aimed to examine the attitudes of young consumers (18-35 years old) in the Banja Luka region toward farm animal welfare and their willingness to support products from systems with higher welfare standards. A total of 230 respondents who consume animal-based products participated in the survey. The results indicate that most respondents (79%) are familiar with the concept of farm animal welfare, while 98% consider animal welfare protection on farms important. Women are significantly more familiar with the concept and perceive it as more important compared to men (p<0.05). Respondents identified farmers (71%) as the key stakeholders in ensuring animal welfare, followed by veterinarians (66%) and animal protection organizations (51%). In contrast, consumers were perceived as the least influential stakeholders (63%). Statistically significant differences in attitudes toward specific stakeholders were observed between women and men (p<0.05) but not in relation to respondents' age, education, household income, or place of residence (p>0.05). The vast majority of respondents (96%) support financial compensation for farmers due to increased production costs resulting from higher animal welfare standards. Additionally, 91% of respondents are willing to pay a higher price for products from farms that uphold animal welfare standards, with 29% willing to pay up to 10% more and 27% willing to pay over 20% more. Women expressed significantly greater willingness to pay a higher price compared to men (p<0.05). These findings indicate a high level of awareness among young consumers regarding animal welfare and their willingness to support production systems that ensure better welfare conditions for farm animals.
References
Alonso, M. E., González-Montaña, J. R., & Lomillos, J. M. (2020). Consumers' concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals, 10(3), 385. DOI: 10.3390/ani10030385
Blanc, S., Massaglia, S., Borra, D., Mosso, A., & Merlino, V. M. (2020). Animal welfare and gender: a nexus in awareness and preference when choosing fresh beef meat?. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 19(1), 410-420, DOI: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1747952
Bozzo, G., Barrasso, R., Grimaldi, C. A., Tantillo, G., & Roma, R. (2020). Consumer attitudes towards animal welfare and their willingness to pay. Veterinaria Italiana, 55(4), 289-297. DOI: 10.12834/VetIt.1823.9669.2
Christensen, T., Denver, S., & Sandøe, P. (2019). How best to improve farm animal welfare? Four main approaches viewed from an economic perspective. Animal Welfare, 28(1), 95-106. DOI: 10.7120/09627286.28.1.095
Clark, B., Stewart, G. B., Panzone, L. A., Kyriazakis, I., & Frewer, L. J. (2016) A systematic review of public attitudes, perceptions and behaviours towards production diseases associated with farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29, 455-478. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-016-9615-x
Di Pasquale, J., Nannoni, E., Del Duca, I., Adinolfi, F., Capitanio, F., Sardi, L., Vitali, M., & Martelli, G. (2014). What foods are identified as animal friendly by Italian consumers? Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13, 4. DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2014.3582
European Commission (2007). Special Eurobarometer 270. Attitudes of EU citizens towards Animal Welfare.
European Commission (2016). Special Eurobarometer 442. Attitudes of Europeans towards Animal Welfare. European Union. DOI:10.2875/884639
European Commission (2023). Special Eurobarometer 533. Attitudes of Europeans towards animal welfare. European Union. DOI: 10.2875/872312
Fernandes, J. N., Hemsworth, P. H., Coleman, G. J., & Tilbrook, A. J. (2021). Costs and benefits of improving farm animal welfare. Agriculture, 11, 104. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11020104
Giannetto, C., Biondi, V., Previti, A., De Pascale, A., Monti, S., Alibrandi, A., Zirilli, A., Lanfranchi, M., Pugliese, M., & Passantino, A. (2023). Willingness to pay a higher price for pork obtained using animal-friendly raising techniques: A consumers’ opinion survey. Foods, 12, 4201. DOI: 10.3390/foods12234201
Grethe, H. (2017). The economics of farm animal welfare. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 9(1), 75-94. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053419
Ingenbleek, P. T. M., Harvey, D., Ilieski, V., Immink, V. M., De Roest, K., & Schmid, O. (2013). The European market for animal-friendly products in a societal context. Animals, 3(3), 808-829. DOI: 10.3390/ani3030808
Jhong-Min, Y. (2023). Willingness to buy animal welfare products: a study on the conflict between moral attitudes and perceived higher prices. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 51(1), 447-455, DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2023.2225586
Miranda de la Lama, G. C., Estévez-Moreno, L. X., Sepúlveda, W. S., Estrada-Chavero, M. C., Rayas-Amor, A. A., Villarroel, M., & María, G. A. (2017) Mexican consumers' perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare and willingness to pay for welfare friendly meat products. Meat Science, 25, 106-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.12.001.
Tomasevic, I., Bahelka, I., Čítek, J., Čandek-Potokar, M., Djekić, I., Getya, A., Guerrero, L., Ivanova, S., Kušec, G., Nakov, D., Sołowiej, B., Stoica, M., Szabó, C., Tudoreanu, L., Weiler, U., & Font-I-Furnols, M. (2020). Attitudes and beliefs of Eastern European consumers towards animal welfare. Animals, 10(7), 1220. DOI: 10.3390/ani10071220
Tüfenk, Ö. G., & Bozkurt, Z. (2022). Consumer attitudes towards animal welfare and its relation to demographic and socio-economic factors. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Animal Research, 11(2), 74-87.
Victor Spain, C., Freund, D., Mohan-Gibbons, H., Meadow, R. G., & Beacham, L. (2018). Are they buying it? United States consumers’ changing attitudes toward more humanely raised meat, eggs, and dairy. Animals, 8, 128, DOI:10.3390/ani8080128
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anastasija Grgić, Milana Šešum, Marinko Vekić, Nemanja Jalić, Aleksandar Ostojić

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.