The effect of applied fertilization treatments on grain yield and harvest residues of broad bean (Vicia faba ssp. eufaba var. major Harz.)

Authors

  • Željko Lakić Public Institution Agricultural Institute of Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Marina Antić University of Banja Luka, Institute of Genetics Resources, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63356/agrores.2025.013

Keywords:

broad bean, fertilization treatments, grain yield, harvesting residue yield, harvest index

Abstract

The experiments were conducted on the demonstration field of the Agricultural Institute of the Republic of Srpska, from 2021 to 2023. The aim of this research was to examine the effect of applied fertilization treatments on the yield of grain and harvesting residues of broad beans under the agro-ecological conditions of the Banja Luka region. Sowing was done manually in the second half of March each year of the study. The experiment was set up in four replications using a randomized block design, with the size of the basic plot being 10 m². For these trials, seed from the broad bean population from the Institute's collection was used, with a sowing rate of 220 kg ha⁻¹. During the study, four fertilization treatments were tested: control (T1), NPK 15:15:15 at a dose of 300 kg ha⁻¹ (T2), biostimulator Slavol S at a dose of 250 ml ha⁻¹ (T3), and NPK 15:15:15 at a dose of 300 kg ha⁻¹ + biostimulator Slavol S at a dose of 250 ml ha⁻¹ (T4). The following parameters were monitored during the study: grain yield per unit area (kg ha⁻¹), harvesting residue yield (kg ha⁻¹), biological yield (kg ha⁻¹), the share of empty dry pods in the harvesting residues (%), the share of dry matter in the plant in the harvesting residues (%), and the harvest index (HI, %). During these experiments, the grain yield of beans ranged from 1,096.7 kg ha⁻¹ in treatment T1 (2021) to 3,240.0 kg ha⁻¹ in treatment T4 (2023). The highest average grain yield during these studies was achieved with treatment T4, amounting to 2,679.9 kg ha⁻¹. The average yield of harvesting residues during the study ranged from 3,049.7 kg ha⁻¹ (T1) to 3,986.8 kg ha⁻¹ (T4). The share of empty dry pods in the total harvesting residue yield varied from 25.5% in treatment T1 (2022) to 36.5% in treatment T4 (2021). On the plots where only the biostimulator (T3) was used, the lowest harvest index was recorded (31.5%), while the highest was achieved with treatment T2 (40.9%).

References

Akgun, D., & Canci, H. (2023). Selection of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Genotypes for High Yield, Essential Amino Acids and Low Anti-Nutritional Factors. Agriculture, 13, 932. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13050932

Bhomik, Ch. I., Or Rashid, H. M., Paul, Ch. N., Yesmin, N. M., Saha, K. K., Rashid, H. M., Paul, K. S. (2022). Application of rhizobia boosts the growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under field condition. Fundamental and Applied Agriculture, 7(3), 206–215. DOI: 10.5455/faa.110106

Bogale, S., Melaku, S., & Yami, A. (2008). Potential use of crop residues as livestock feed resources under smallholder farmers conditions in bale highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 8, 107–114.

Chaudhary, V., Kajla, P., & Shobhit (2022). Chemistry, Nutrient Composition and Quality of Faba Beans. In S. Punia Bangar & S. Bala Dhull (Eds.), Faba Bean: Chemistry, Properties and Functionality. Springer International Publishing, pp.75–96. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-14587-2_4

De Cillis, F., Leoni, B., Massaro, M., Renna, M., & Santamaria, P. (2019). Yield and Quality of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L. var. major) Genotypes as a Vegetable for Fresh Consumption: A Comparison between Italian Landraces and Commercial Varieties. Agriculture, 9(12), 253. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture9120253

Dobocha, D., Worku, W., Bekela, D., Mulatu, Z., Shimeles, F., & Admasu, A. (2019). The response of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) varieties as evaluated by var- ied plant population densities in the highlands of Arsi Zone, Southeastern Ethiopia. Bionatura, 4, 846–851. DOI: 10.21931/rb/2019.04.02.5

Gurmessa, K., Tolemariam, T., Tolera, A., & Beyene, F. (2016). Production and utilization of crop residues in Horro and Guduru districts, western Ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management, 48, 77–84.

Inci, N., & Toker, C. (2011): Screening and selection of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) for cold tolerance and comparison to wild relatives. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 58, 1169–1175. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-010-9649-2

Jensen, E. S., Peoples, M. B., & Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. (2010). Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crop Research, 115, 203–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.008

Jensen, S. E., Peoples, B. M., Boddey, M. R., Gresshoff, M. P., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H, Alves, J. R. B., & Morrison, J. M. (2012). Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, 329–364. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-011-0056-7

Krenz, M. M. L., Grebenteuch, S., Zocher, K., Rohn, S., & Pleissner, D. (2023). Valorization of faba bean (Vicia faba) by-products. Agricultural and Food Sciences, 14, 26663-26680. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-03779-9

Lakić, Ž., Antić, M., & Popović, V. (2024). The influence of different fertilization methods on the components of yield and the grain yield of faba bean (Vicia faba ssp. eufaba var. minor). Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Agricultural Sciences "AgroRes 2024", 27-30 May, Trebinje, BiH, pp. 97-104. DOI: 10.7251/ZARS2401097L

Lakić, Ž., Nožinić, M., Antić, M., & Popović, V. (2022). The influence of the biostimulator on the yield components and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba var. minor). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 50, 4, 12998. DOI: 10.15835/nbha50412998

Li, X., & Yang, Y. P. (2014). A novel perspective on seed yield of broad bean (Vicia faba L.): Differences resulting from pod characteristics. Scientific Reports, 4(4), 6859. DOI: 10.1038/srep06859

Loss, S. P., & Siddique, K. H. M. (1997). Adaptation of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to dryland Mediterranean type environments. 1. Seed yield and yield components. Field Crop Research, 52, 17-28.

Nebiyu, A., Vandorpe, A., Diels, J., & Boeckx, P. (2014). Nitrogen and phosphorus benefits from faba bean (Vicia faba L.) residues to subsequent wheat crop in the humid highlands of Ethiopia. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 98, 253–266. DOI: 10.1007/s10705-014-9609-x

Renna, M., Signore, A., Paradiso, V. M., & Santamaria, P. (2018). Faba greens, globe artichoke’s offshoots, crenate broomrape and summer squash greens: unconventional vegetables of Puglia (southern Italy) with good quality traits. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 378. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00378

Youseif, S., El-Megeed, F. A., & Saleh, S. (2017). Improvement of faba bean yield using Rhizobium / Agrobacterium inoculant in low-fertility sandy soil. Agronomy, 7, 2–12. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy7010002

Yuan, J. H., & Xu, R. K. (2012). Effects of biochars generated from crop residues on chemical properties of acid soils from tropical and subtropical China. Soil Research, 50, 570. DOI: 10.1071/SR12118

Zehring, J., Walter, S., Quendt, U., Zocher, K., & Rohn, S. (2022). Phytic acid content of faba beans (Vicia faba) - annual and varietal effects, and influence of organic cultivation practices. Agronomy, 12, 889. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12040889

Zhang, W., Li, L., Li, Q., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Preparation and characterization of biopolyols and polyurethane foams from liquefied faba bean stalk. Cellular Polymers, 33, 301–318. DOI: 10.1177/026248931403300602

Downloads

Published

2025-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles